2022 has seen a range of planning cases going through the courts, with landmark judgments already shaping planning applications and the process of bringing developments forward.
From Hillside’s influence on drop-in planning applications to the environmental impact assessment of crude oil extraction, experts from Shoosmiths’ planning team have examined five of the year’s key cases and their implications on the planning system and real estate industry.
Featuring insight from:
- Tim Willis, partner
- Chloe Mulhall, paralegal, on DB Symmetry Ltd and another (Respondents) v Swindon Borough Council (Appellant)
- Matthew Price, associate, on R (Wyatt) v Fareham BC & Natural England
- Hannah Cotterill, associate, on R (Finch) v Surrey County Council
- Gabrielle Wall, trainee solicitor, on R (Suliman) v Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council
- Stuart Tym, partner, on Hillside Parks Ltd (Appellant) v Snowdonia National Park Authority (Respondent)
Disclaimer
This information is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It is recommended that specific professional advice is sought before acting on any of the information given. Please contact us for specific advice on your circumstances. © Shoosmiths LLP 2025.